{"id":796,"date":"2017-05-11T11:22:06","date_gmt":"2017-05-11T11:22:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/reformingretail.com\/?p=796"},"modified":"2019-01-23T07:56:00","modified_gmt":"2019-01-23T13:56:00","slug":"the-numbers-youre-not-seeing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/reformingretail.com\/index.php\/2017\/05\/11\/the-numbers-youre-not-seeing\/","title":{"rendered":"The Numbers You\u2019re Not Seeing"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"This guest post comes from John Giles, founder of Future POS<\/a>. John makes an emphatic point that we will strive to hammer home in a series of later posts: POS dealers need to become business advisors in the changing market. They need to put the Value back in Value Added Reseller and learn to sell on ROI. Those that don’t will have a difficult time proving relevance.<\/em><\/p>\n

I regularly read lots of articles by various point of sale and payments experts because I love to get alternative viewpoints. It helps me to stay well rounded and I very much enjoy the well-articulated, thought provoking articles by guys like Gideon Samid. It\u2019s also fun to see your competition get poked in the eye from time to time.<\/p>\n

One of my takeaways from 20+ years in the point-of-sale industry is how much everyone loves a good knee jerk reaction.  It\u2019s like the dot com bubble, but much more frequent and far less catastrophic.  Every ISV can relate to this situation:  \u201cWe\u2019ve GOT to have that feature. Product X has it, and Product Y is probably working on it. If we don\u2019t have it by next year we\u2019ll all go out of business.\u201d Remember the release of ApplePay in 2014? My resellers were sure that we would all perish if we didn\u2019t find a way to include ApplePay into our software immediately. Two and a half years later I still can\u2019t use ApplePay or SamsungPay in most of the places I go. When a store says it is supported, I only half believe it because a large percentage of the time it doesn\u2019t work and you feel stupid for holding up the line with your science experiment.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a common industry practice to look at the hospitality market as layers of a pyramid.  The Chili’s of the world are at the top, and the one-unit hipster coffee shop is at the bottom.  The pyramid is pointy for a reason: for every Chili’s there are approximately 380 independent restaurant owners. Future POS has always done very well in the independent market, as well as small to mid-sized chains, and we continue to climb the pyramid rapidly.  Why? Because the bottom of the pyramid has become polluted with tablet POS and will take a few more years to re-consolidate. It used to be that we ran into cash registers in that segment of the market, and that was any easy comparison that everyone understood. With the tablet POS, it looks enough like a legit POS system to \u201cfool\u201d most consumers, when in fact if you sat 99% of them next to a Sam4 Cash Register, the Sam4 would have far more functionality, be far more reliable, and save you a ton of money in the long run. Hell, with all the hidden fees, most tablet POS systems cost more than a stable and mature Windows POS in a 3 year period.<\/p>\n

So I see statistics being quoted like \u201c26% of merchants are buying their POS directly\u201d and the natural VAR reaction is probably to assume the sky is falling.  And some of them should be very worried. For many years during the golden age of point-of-sale, resellers sold on price. It was easy; Micros and Aloha were always more expensive, and the fact that we could effectively do everything those big guys do for less money helped us do extremely well in the independent market.<\/p>\n

But times have changed. You can\u2019t sell a Windows terminal today against the price of an iPad and make money, or even stay in business. These aren\u2019t really apples-to-apples comparisons, but many VARs have gotten fat and lazy by dropping their price 5% and automatically winning for well over a decade.  These VARs need to rethink their strategy or go the way of the dinosaur. <\/strong> They need to become the customer\u2019s \u201ctrusted advisor\u201d and guide them through the pros\/cons of the various systems out there, and let them choose what fits their business. They need to know their product, and be able to demonstrate several reasons why it\u2019s better and will save or make the customer money. Selling on ROI would be a good place to start; it worked for Xerox for decades.<\/p>\n

So let me get to the point of the article: the numbers you aren\u2019t seeing. A quick Google search revealed that 59% of startup restaurants go under in 3 years<\/span>. Every VAR is familiar with this common startup story:  \u201cWe had some cost overruns on construction, unexpected costs, (fill in the blank), and we don\u2019t have money left for the point of sale system we know we need.\u201d  So the POS VAR goes away empty handed and the startup restaurant buys some internet tablet POS. Back in the day, that same startup would have gone to Staples and bought a Royal Cash Register. Today, it\u2019s a sexy tablet POS that lacks meaningful features and reliability.<\/p>\n

But how the story ends is still the same. How many Chili’s do you hear about going under in the first 3 years?  For that matter, how many 50+ unit chains, or 20+ unit chains, or even 3 unit chains fall into that 59% failure rate? I would bet damn few. So let me leave you with some food for thought. What percentage of that 26% of \u201cself-installers\u201d will fall into the 59% of failed businesses in 3 years<\/span>?  My guess is that the percentage of self-installers who fail is far higher than 59%.<\/p>\n

I would love to see a follow-up survey by Bob Frazier in three years<\/span>.<\/p>\n